| adam (adam_rox) | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
adam_rox Noob
Posts : 2 Join date : 2012-01-30
| Subject: adam (adam_rox) Mon Jan 30, 2012 12:48 pm | |
| dear staff,
i want to be a mod
my game name is adam_rox
im 12 years old
my timezone is Victoria Austraila
i will be available 3:40-8:00 most nights
im nice and create im good with mod and texture pack downloading
i really like the server and the players on the server
you should me because i will help other players and contune building new site
from adam (adam_rox)
Last edited by adam_rox on Mon Jan 30, 2012 7:31 pm; edited 2 times in total | |
|
| |
Trololamb New Member
Posts : 21 Join date : 2012-01-15
| Subject: fasds Mon Jan 30, 2012 2:51 pm | |
| Please tell us why we should choose you among others. | |
|
| |
Potentialares Advanced Member
Posts : 354 Join date : 2012-01-26 Age : 110 Location : Columbia, South Carolina
| Subject: Re: adam (adam_rox) Mon Jan 30, 2012 5:49 pm | |
| Ive only seen you online once, you haven't done anything special, and you're going straight for a high position. You also gave no reason as to why you should be accepted to the position. This app had absolutely no substance to it. I'm sorry but there is no reason to accept you for this position. | |
|
| |
timmyoseaton J-Mod
Posts : 202 Join date : 2012-01-15 Age : 28 Location : Alaska.
| Subject: Re: adam (adam_rox) Mon Jan 30, 2012 9:48 pm | |
| - Potentialares wrote:
- Ive only seen you online once, you haven't done anything special, and you're going straight for a high position. You also gave no reason as to why you should be accepted to the position. This app had absolutely no substance to it. I'm sorry but there is no reason to accept you for this position.
You are completly right, he is never on I have only seen him on once which is last night. I think you should try again in a month or a couple weeks and get trusted. Then try. But now it is a low chance. | |
|
| |
Potentialares Advanced Member
Posts : 354 Join date : 2012-01-26 Age : 110 Location : Columbia, South Carolina
| Subject: Re: adam (adam_rox) Mon Jan 30, 2012 11:13 pm | |
| - timmyoseaton wrote:
- Potentialares wrote:
- Ive only seen you online once, you haven't done anything special, and you're going straight for a high position. You also gave no reason as to why you should be accepted to the position. This app had absolutely no substance to it. I'm sorry but there is no reason to accept you for this position.
You are completly right, he is never on I have only seen him on once which is last night. I think you should try again in a month or a couple weeks and get trusted. Then try. But now it is a low chance. And then the grammar...*shiver* | |
|
| |
ikoi99 Semi-Admin
Posts : 361 Join date : 2012-01-15 Age : 29
| Subject: Re: adam (adam_rox) Tue Jan 31, 2012 12:31 am | |
| - Potentialares wrote:
- timmyoseaton wrote:
- Potentialares wrote:
- Ive only seen you online once, you haven't done anything special, and you're going straight for a high position. You also gave no reason as to why you should be accepted to the position. This app had absolutely no substance to it. I'm sorry but there is no reason to accept you for this position.
You are completly right, he is never on I have only seen him on once which is last night. I think you should try again in a month or a couple weeks and get trusted. Then try. But now it is a low chance. And then the grammar...*shiver* Too true | |
|
| |
Potentialares Advanced Member
Posts : 354 Join date : 2012-01-26 Age : 110 Location : Columbia, South Carolina
| Subject: Re: adam (adam_rox) Tue Jan 31, 2012 12:39 am | |
| - ikoi99 wrote:
- Potentialares wrote:
- timmyoseaton wrote:
- Potentialares wrote:
- Ive only seen you online once, you haven't done anything special, and you're going straight for a high position. You also gave no reason as to why you should be accepted to the position. This app had absolutely no substance to it. I'm sorry but there is no reason to accept you for this position.
You are completly right, he is never on I have only seen him on once which is last night. I think you should try again in a month or a couple weeks and get trusted. Then try. But now it is a low chance. And then the grammar...*shiver* Too true I don't know if a builder has a right to vote, but -1 if he does. This is just not a good app. | |
|
| |
ikoi99 Semi-Admin
Posts : 361 Join date : 2012-01-15 Age : 29
| Subject: Re: adam (adam_rox) Tue Jan 31, 2012 12:46 am | |
| - Potentialares wrote:
- ikoi99 wrote:
- Potentialares wrote:
- timmyoseaton wrote:
- Potentialares wrote:
- Ive only seen you online once, you haven't done anything special, and you're going straight for a high position. You also gave no reason as to why you should be accepted to the position. This app had absolutely no substance to it. I'm sorry but there is no reason to accept you for this position.
You are completly right, he is never on I have only seen him on once which is last night. I think you should try again in a month or a couple weeks and get trusted. Then try. But now it is a low chance. And then the grammar...*shiver* Too true I don't know if a builder has a right to vote, but -1 if he does. This is just not a good app. I agree -1 from me | |
|
| |
kd280z Owner
Posts : 304 Join date : 2012-01-02 Age : 26 Location : Connecticut, USA
| Subject: Re: adam (adam_rox) Tue Jan 31, 2012 4:52 pm | |
| I am tempted to add a "Trusted" rank. The idea behind this is that before you can apply for any position at all (excluding VIP, that is just donating not applying) you must be that rank, that we we cut down on useless applications and increase loyalty and how well we know the applicant. | |
|
| |
Potentialares Advanced Member
Posts : 354 Join date : 2012-01-26 Age : 110 Location : Columbia, South Carolina
| Subject: Re: adam (adam_rox) Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:47 pm | |
| - kd280z wrote:
- I am tempted to add a "Trusted" rank. The idea behind this is that before you can apply for any position at all (excluding VIP, that is just donating not applying) you must be that rank, that we we cut down on useless applications and increase loyalty and how well we know the applicant.
I really think this is an amazing idea. It would help so much. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: adam (adam_rox) | |
| |
|
| |
| adam (adam_rox) | |
|